Amavisd spam score low

[Will Hall]

Have now installed the non-forwarding dns server unbound and am no
longer black listed, yay!
Given that spamassassin and amavisd both use the same underling Perl
modules, I still don't fully understand why they are giving such wildly
different results.
Still, it seems that things have improved so your advice & help are much
appreciated.

Will


On 31/08/17 20:56, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Will Hall skrev den 2017-08-31 21:41:
>> Many thanks for the reply.
> 
> +1
> 
>> Not sure I completely follow when you say "spammers have a free ride on
>> your limited data'.
> 
> its possible not just uribl, but uribl tells you need to solve dns
> 
>> Yes, I am blocked by uribl, but resolving this is not trivial (am
>> looking into it). However, I don't think this explains why the bayes
>> scores are so different - are the two issues connected?
> 
> good, bayes track changes, and raw amavisd and spamassassin can get
> diffrent results, its not a bug anywhere, if you get dns problem solved
> bayes will learn more on bad or good things, so you dont need to train
> bayes so much anylonger, all in all solve dns and report problem after
> you have this working