Amavisd spam score low

[Benny Pedersen]

Will Hall skrev den 2017-08-31 21:41:
> Many thanks for the reply.

+1

> Not sure I completely follow when you say "spammers have a free ride on
> your limited data'.

its possible not just uribl, but uribl tells you need to solve dns

> Yes, I am blocked by uribl, but resolving this is not trivial (am
> looking into it). However, I don't think this explains why the bayes
> scores are so different - are the two issues connected?

good, bayes track changes, and raw amavisd and spamassassin can get 
diffrent results, its not a bug anywhere, if you get dns problem solved 
bayes will learn more on bad or good things, so you dont need to train 
bayes so much anylonger, all in all solve dns and report problem after 
you have this working