X-Spam header missing regardless of low sa_tag_level_deflt but scores present in logs

Bert Van de Poel bert at bhack.net
Thu Aug 18 11:45:47 CEST 2022

Could you elaborate how exactly this information would leak to spammers 
this way? I'm not sure how they would be able to.
I see the merits in not putting ".", but I'm mostly wondering how mail 
could be routed in such a way.

On 18/08/2022 03:18, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Bert Van de Poel skrev den 2022-08-18 01:18:
>> Thanks for your help Benny and Matus!
>> It seems like my problem was indeed @local_domains_acl. I've now had
>> it set to "." for a few hours and all my mail is getting tagged as it
>> should.
> do not just add "." there, you expose private info to all remote 
> domains, never help spammers to defeat spam filters ever
> but now you know why headers was missing, then you can resolve it with 
> a valid list of local domains where this info is welcommed :=)

More information about the amavis-users mailing list