X-Spam header missing regardless of low sa_tag_level_deflt but scores present in logs

[Bert Van de Poel]

Hi Benny,

I had been wondering if I would see the same people here as on the 
spamassassin users list ;)

The only domain reference that I have in both my current configuration 
and the one I had on Debian 8 is the file "05-domain_id":
use strict;

# $mydomain is used just for convenience in the config files and it is not
# used internally by amavisd-new except in the default X_HEADER_LINE (which
# Debian overrides by default anyway).

chomp($mydomain = `head -n 1 /etc/mailname`);

# amavisd-new needs to know which email domains are to be considered local
# to the administrative domain.  Only emails to "local" domains are subject
# to certain functionality, such as the addition of spam tags.
#
# Default local domains to $mydomain and all subdomains.  Remember to
# override or redefine this if $mydomain is changed later in the config
# sequence.

@local_domains_acl = ( ".$mydomain" );

1;  # ensure a defined return


/etc/mailname contains sys.bhack.net and nothing else

I have been wondering about this "RelayedOpenRelay" too, but I don't see 
anything being "too open".


On 17/08/2022 14:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Bert Van de Poel skrev den 2022-08-17 12:24:
>
>> Aug 17 11:59:33 sys amavis[2337329]: (2337329-17) Passed CLEAN
>> {RelayedOpenRelay}, [127.0.0.1] [40.107.20.101]
>> <bert.vandepoel at uclouvain.be> -> <bert at bhack.net>, Message-ID:
>> <8e22260c-6d20-86e4-d9e1-1a5d8a9632b9 at uclouvain.be>, mail_id:
>> 4EKz9ECqUE6T, Hits: 1.785, size: 8356, queued_as: 7C866BC40C, 3746 ms
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea what I've done wrong or what I should be 
>> looking for?
>
> is bhack.net listed local domain in amavisd ?, only local domains see 
> spam headers added
>
> others might help with solve RelayedOpenRelay is imho susspisious 
> aswell, i have lost why its there, last posting about this was imho 
> unresolved