Scoring questions

[Computer Bob]

It starts with debug-sa, stays in the console window and puts does not 
put debug-sa info into mail.log but displays it at the console that 
called it.

On 1/29/18 2:33 PM, Dino Edwards wrote:
>
> Please run amavisd in debug mode.
>
> Stop the service
>
> /etc/init.d/amavis stop
>
> Then start in debug mode:
>
> /etc/init.d/amavis debug
>
> Open another session to your mail server and look at you 
> /var/log/mail.log and you should see the following upon amavisd 
> startup (or similar):
>
> Jan 29 15:30:55.078 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: 
> initializing Mail::SpamAssassin (0)
>
> Jan 29 15:30:55.078 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: 
> SpamAssassin debug facilities: info
>
> Jan 29 15:30:55.712 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: SA 
> info: zoom: able to use 315/360 'body_0' compiled rules (87.5%)
>
> Jan 29 15:30:56.454 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: 
> SpamAssassin loaded plugins: AskDNS, AutoLearnThreshold, Bayes, 
> BodyEval, Check, DCC, DKIM, DNSEval, FreeMail, HTMLEval, 
> HTTPSMismatch, Hashcash, HeaderEval, ImageInfo, MIMEEval, MIMEHeader, 
> Pyzor, Razor2, RelayEval, ReplaceTags, Rule2XSBody, SPF, SpamCop, 
> URIDNSBL, URIDetail, URIEval, VBounce, WLBLEval, WhiteListSubject
>
> Jan 29 15:30:56.455 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: 
> SpamControl: init_pre_fork on SpamAssassin done
>
> Jan 29 15:30:56.455 mail.domain.tld /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8330]: extra 
> modules loaded after daemonizing/chrooting: 
> /usr/lib/perl5/auto/NetAddr/IP/InetBase/inet_n2dx.al, 
> Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm, 
> Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/FreeMail.pm, Net/DNS/RR/OPT.pm
>
> *From:*Computer Bob [mailto:bob at inter-control.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2018 3:24 PM
> *To:* Dino Edwards <dino.edwards at mydirectmail.net>; 
> amavis-users at amavis.org
> *Subject:* Re: Scoring questions
>
> Changes made, amavis restarted.
> I have seen the following on all mails, I just was too lazy to include 
> it because I had to blank the server name...skuza..
>
> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at M1-2.myorganization.org
>
> On 1/29/18 2:15 PM, Dino Edwards wrote:
>
>     Please try
>
>     $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
>     In
>
>     /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user
>
>     Do you see the X-Virus-Scanned header in the emails that amavisd
>     processes?
>
>     *From:*amavis-users
>     [mailto:amavis-users-bounces+dino.edwards=mydirectmail.net at amavis.org]
>     *On Behalf Of *Computer Bob
>     *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2018 2:40 PM
>     *To:* amavis-users at amavis.org <mailto:amavis-users at amavis.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: Scoring questions
>
>     I also agree that at this point auto learn should be off and
>     cleared as I have done.
>     But I still continue to get garbage mails through showing headers
>     such as:
>
>     X-Spam-Flag: NO
>
>     X-Spam-Score: 0.61
>
>     X-Spam-Level:
>
>     X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.61 tagged_above=-9999 required=5
>
>              tests=[HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.61,
>
>              HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
>
>              T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
>
>              autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>
>       
>
>     And as I said, when I run them through SA at the command line they
>     seem to score correctly.
>     The scores being given in the headers can't be correct as they all
>     are similarly low and wrong.
>     An interesting note is that if I try and forward one of these
>     received, they get flagged and sent to spam.
>     Without knowing the intricacies of the amavis procedural steps, or
>     were to start, it is not possible for me to troubleshoot.
>
>
>     On 1/29/18 1:20 PM, Dino Edwards wrote:
>
>         I disagree it's bad advice considering it's autolearn that seems to be creating at least some of the problems he's experiencing.
>
>           
>
>         However, I do agree, the AutoLearn Threshold should definitely be set IF you are going to be using autolearn but in my experience auto-learn creates more problems than it solves. I believe that only humans should be be used for training the bayes database. Auto-learning has the tendency to exaggerate issues over time.
>
>           
>
>         Keep it simple for now and train your bayes database and after you've trained it and it's scoring well, then consider using autolearn.
>
>           
>
>           
>
>           
>
>           
>
>           
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>
>         From: amavis-users [mailto:amavis-users-bounces+dino.edwards=mydirectmail.net at amavis.org] On Behalf Of Benny Pedersen
>
>         Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 1:06 PM
>
>         To:amavis-users at amavis.org <mailto:amavis-users at amavis.org>
>
>         Subject: Re: Re: Scoring questions
>
>           
>
>         Computer Bob skrev den 2018-01-29 18:57:
>
>             I assume you mean bayes_auto_learn in local.cf. I set it to 0 from 1
>
>             and restarted.
>
>           
>
>         yes its just bad advise, but setting this is what disables autolearn
>
>           
>
>         i suggest see autolearnthreashold instaed
>
>           
>
>         https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html
>
>           
>
>         bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -5
>
>         bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.5
>
>           
>
>         let the spammers win now :)
>
>           
>
>           
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/attachments/20180129/5bae17e2/attachment.html>