Question about scoring with sanesecurity signatures

[Nikolaos Milas]

On 13/10/2012 7:22 μμ, Noel Jones wrote:

>> Also, would you deem a value of "5.0" as a sensible*initial*  value
>> >(based on experience) to avoid FPs? I have not used these rules
>> >again in the past, and I would appreciate some advice before
>> >migrating our production systems (i.e. our mail gateways) to the
>> >Postfix/Amavis/ClamAV/SpamAssassin platform.
> Depends on your spam cutoff score.  I would suggest starting with a
> score 3 points or so below your spam score, so that this single rule
> doesn't determine something to be spam.

When you say "spam cutoff score", you mean "sa_kill_level_deflt" or some 
other setting (which)?

Thanks,
Nick