OT, Re: unchecked_lovers_maps in sql READMEs
simon.brereton at buongiorno.com
Tue Nov 22 15:54:59 CET 2011
On 21 November 2011 21:16, TimH <thowe at bendtel.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:18:31 -0800
> TimH <thowe at bendtel.net> wrote:
>> There is a new field in the policy table named "unchecked_lovers_maps"
>> in the schema provided in the sql readme files. However, it seems like
>> it should be "unchecked_lover" in the schemas. The release notes seem
>> to agree with me:
>> "for consistencly, added LDAP attribute amavisUncheckedLover, along
>> with its corresponding SQL field 'unchecked_lover' and a statical
>> list of lookup tables @unchecked_lovers_maps, which appears in the
>> %lovers_maps_by_ccat. Previously the CC_UNCHECKED entry of the
>> %lovers_maps_by_ccat was (ab)used and shared the @virus_lovers_maps
>> value. Suggested by Patrick Ben Koetter;"
>> So, in order to work correctly, should the provided schemas be changed
>> so that the field name is "unchecked_lover"?
I can't for the life of me (or after 10 minutes googling) work out
what unchecked_lovers is designed to indicate or do. Can anyone shed
some light? :)
More information about the amavis-users