OT, Re: unchecked_lovers_maps in sql READMEs

Simon Brereton simon.brereton at buongiorno.com
Tue Nov 22 15:54:59 CET 2011

On 21 November 2011 21:16, TimH <thowe at bendtel.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:18:31 -0800
> TimH <thowe at bendtel.net> wrote:
>> There is a new field in the policy table named "unchecked_lovers_maps"
>> in the schema provided in the sql readme files.  However, it seems like
>> it should be "unchecked_lover" in the schemas.  The release notes seem
>> to agree with me:
>>  "for consistencly, added LDAP attribute amavisUncheckedLover, along
>>   with its corresponding SQL field 'unchecked_lover' and a statical
>>   list of lookup tables @unchecked_lovers_maps, which appears in the
>>   %lovers_maps_by_ccat. Previously the CC_UNCHECKED entry of the
>>   %lovers_maps_by_ccat was (ab)used and shared the @virus_lovers_maps
>>   value. Suggested by Patrick Ben Koetter;"
>> So, in order to work correctly, should the provided schemas be changed
>> so that the field name is "unchecked_lover"?

I can't for the life of me (or after 10 minutes googling) work out
what unchecked_lovers is designed to indicate or do.  Can anyone shed
some light? :)


More information about the amavis-users mailing list