Spam sneaking in.

[Bob D]

Sorry for delay, been on sabbatical.

On 8/9/19 5:34 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 8/6/19 5:51 PM, Bob D wrote:
>>> root at M1-2:~# grep -Fr '$sa_local_tests_only' /etc/amavis/conf.d
>>> /etc/amavis/conf.d/20-debian_defaults:$sa_local_tests_only = 0;    # 
>>> only tests which do not require internet access?
>>> root at M1-2:~#
>>>
>>> I assume 0 = false
>>> This one was in a bunch in today,
>>> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>>> X-Spam-Score: 0.311
>>> X-Spam-Level:
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.311 required=4 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5,
>>>     DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
>>>     DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DKIM_VERIFIED=-3, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
>>>     T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>>>
>>> Here is the replay to:
>>> Reply-To:lowtestosterone.treatment at colubiastruts.com
>>> 0.311 ?
>
> On 06.08.19 18:20, Bob D wrote:
>> Here is the amavis debug of the above mail at receive.
>> https://pastebin.com/kHY09Bim
>
> 50_scores.cf:score DKIM_VERIFIED 0
>
> why/where did you set DKIM_VERIFIED score to -3?
>

Was a fight to find where this was and decided that spam I was receiving 
was getting DKIM verified so what  is the value of DKIM ?
I disabled it as it appeared to be worthless.

> DKIM_VERIFIED only confirms that the message was sent from proper 
> server, it
> says nothing about hamminess.
> nearly all yahoo/gmail/hotmail spam has DKIM_VERIFIED.
>
> maybe you are early recipient, and maybe you don't have supporting 
> software
> for network checks like razor, pyzor and dcc installed. They help much.
>

I do have razor, pyzor and dcc installed and functioning as far as I 
could tell.
I reinstalled just to be sure, no avail.
Was still getting spam, only 99% was getting caught.