Flashlight spam (and others)

Dino Edwards dino.edwards at mydirectmail.net
Sat Dec 17 19:04:55 CET 2016

Did you happen to set bayes_00 to assign a score of -4? That’s not default behavior at all. Can you send your local.cf config?


On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Dino Edwards <dino.edwards at mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwards at mydirectmail.net>> wrote:
Am I looking at this right? Does BAYES_00 assign a score of -4 on these messages?

I believe you are; and I do not believe this is how a bayes score should be set..

-----Original Message-----
        *  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
        *  0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS

These 2 tests are not doing anything useful IMHO: if DKIM exists, and _is_ invalid, it should be an immediate spam flag.
No RDNS is a huge flag for an illegitamite mail spam server.

These should both be adding _way_ more points than the bayes_00 is dropping...and bayes should not be dropping so much if at all.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/attachments/20161217/900d6c84/attachment.html>

More information about the amavis-users mailing list