tests_pri_0 taking a long time, but which rule EXACTLY?

[Quanah Gibson-Mount]

--On Friday, May 01, 2015 1:05 AM +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt 
<Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de> wrote:

> * Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de>:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> TIMING-SA is being logged like this:
>>
>> amavis[31273]: (31273-08) TIMING-SA [total 1354 ms, cpu 542 ms] - parse:
>> 3.3 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 76 (5.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 6
>> (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 68 (5.0%), tests_pri_-950: 0.92 (0.1%),
>> tests_pri_-900: 0.96 (0.1%), tests_pri_-400: 37 (2.7%), check_bayes: 35
>> (2.6%), b_tokenize: 16 (1.2%), b_tok_get_all: 10 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 6
>> (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 0.40 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.39 (0.0%),
>> tests_pri_0: 1150 (85.0%),  check_spf: 8 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 0.08
>> (0.0%), check_razor2: 826 (61.0%), tests_pri_500: 5 (0.4%), get_report:
>> 0.58 (0.0%)
>>
>> As you can see, "tests_pri_0: 1150 (85.0%)" is taking up most of the
>> time in SA (with check_razor2 coming in at second place).
>>
>> But how can I drill down further, in order to see which tests in the
>> SA ruleset take longest?
>
> Is http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/2011-May/000330.html
> really my best bet?

Seems more like a question for SpamAssassin?

In any case, send the message in question directly through SA with debug 
all enabled?

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration