Spam Score Analysis

Michael Scheidell michael.scheidell at
Thu Sep 8 22:31:58 CEST 2011

On 9/8/11 2:28 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ***********.org
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 3.324
> X-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.324 tagged_above=-999 required=3
>      tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.906, RCVD_IN_PBL=3.335,
>      RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
> Is there a way I can determine what caused this email to get scored as such?
yes, it is because
#1, you set your required score to 3. recommended score is 5.  if you 
had set it to 5, you would not have this problem
#2, your local_networks/trusted networks is wrong.  it his RCVD_IN_PBL rule.

since you neglected to include any header information at all, #2 is just 
a guess.

concentrate on #2, google, see FAQ's on amavisd and SA web sites.

Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
    * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
    * Hot Company Finalist 2011
    * Best Email Security Product
    * Certified SNORT Integrator

This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the amavis-users mailing list