Spam Score Analysis
michael.scheidell at secnap.com
Thu Sep 8 22:31:58 CEST 2011
On 9/8/11 2:28 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ***********.org
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 3.324
> X-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.324 tagged_above=-999 required=3
> tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.906, RCVD_IN_PBL=3.335,
> RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
> Is there a way I can determine what caused this email to get scored as such?
yes, it is because
#1, you set your required score to 3. recommended score is 5. if you
had set it to 5, you would not have this problem
#2, your local_networks/trusted networks is wrong. it his RCVD_IN_PBL rule.
since you neglected to include any header information at all, #2 is just
concentrate on #2, google, see FAQ's on amavisd and SA web sites.
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the amavis-users