unchecked_lovers_maps in sql READMEs

TimH thowe at bendtel.net
Tue Nov 22 03:16:33 CET 2011

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:18:31 -0800
TimH <thowe at bendtel.net> wrote:

> There is a new field in the policy table named "unchecked_lovers_maps"
> in the schema provided in the sql readme files.  However, it seems like
> it should be "unchecked_lover" in the schemas.  The release notes seem
> to agree with me:
>  "for consistencly, added LDAP attribute amavisUncheckedLover, along
>   with its corresponding SQL field 'unchecked_lover' and a statical
>   list of lookup tables @unchecked_lovers_maps, which appears in the
>   %lovers_maps_by_ccat. Previously the CC_UNCHECKED entry of the
>   %lovers_maps_by_ccat was (ab)used and shared the @virus_lovers_maps
>   value. Suggested by Patrick Ben Koetter;"
> So, in order to work correctly, should the provided schemas be changed
> so that the field name is "unchecked_lover"?
> --TimH


	In a nutshell, shouldn't policy.unchecked_lovers_maps be
policy.unchecked_lover in the SQL schemas?

	Also, should users.local be a boolean instead of a char?


More information about the amavis-users mailing list