dkim fails ?

[Benny Pedersen]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:16:12 +0200, Mark Martinec
<Mark.Martinec+amavis at ijs.si> wrote:
> 
> Apparently SpamAssassin did not see any DKIM signature in the
> mail header section, let alone finding a valid one, otherwise
> you'd see rules DKIM_SIGNED and DKIM_VALID rules hitting too.

will dkim being checked in all_trusted ?, will try to debug later now from
google mail with smtp auth

> Have you by any chance set score for these two rules to zero?

nope, i have default score on them

> Is the Authentication-Results inserted by the same amavisd/SA
> pair as the X-Spam-Status, or is there any other processing
> going on inbetwen?

is same host for both headers yes

> On Tuesday May 31 2011 20:17:47 Andreas Schulze wrote:
>> ADSP is Author Domain Signing Practices
>> in short: the domainowner tells the world the he/she/it signs _ALL_
mail
>> an tells the verifier also what to do it an unsigned mail is seen.
>> $ dig _adsp._domainkey.junc.org txt +short
>> "dkim=all"
>> so nothing failed but a higher spamscore for signing all mails
>> wonders me too.
> 
> The DKIM_ADSP_* rules only hit in the absence of a DKIM_VALID.

i have not get this above mail you replied to here :(