whitelisting google appointments

[weber at zackbummfertig.de]

 Hi there Maurizio,

 i think you can do this:


 @author_to_policy_bank_maps = ( {
 
      'google.com'          => 'WHITELIST,NOBANNEDCHECK',
      'googlemail.com'          => 'WHITELIST,NOBANNEDCHECK',

 } );


 Put this into /etc/amavis/conf.d/40-policy_banks (its in ubuntu in this 
 directory, i think its no big differ to debian).

 And check if it work.
 Maybe other from this List can agree that i am right.

 marko



 On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:52:03 +0200, Maurizio Marini 
 <maumar at datalogica.com> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> scenario: debian squeeze fully updated
>
> I would white-list following:
>
> <code>
> No viruses were found.
>
> Banned name: text/calendar,.dat,pdmuf0a0dvv9l34 at google.com
> Content type: Banned
> Internal reference code for the message is 19805-05/h0hK2I4XV5xP
>
> [..snip..]
>
> Content-Type: text/calendar; charset=utf-8; method=REPLY;
>  name="pdmusncgf0a0dvv9l34 at google.com"
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>  filename="pdmusncgf0a0dvv9l34 at google.com"
>
> </code>
>
> i suppose that it is banned as the filename is:
> pdmuagf0a0dvv9l34 at google.com
>
> ending with .com
>
> 20-debian_defaults
>   # block certain double extensions anywhere in the base name
>   qr'\.[^./]*\.(vbs|pif|scr|bat|cmd|com|cpl|dll)\.?$'i,
>
>
> this is a false positive, as you can imagine
> what can be done to mitigate this effect?
>
>
> best regards
>
> -- maurizio