<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 6/14/11 11:05 AM, Clayton Keller wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4DF778C2.5090000@ruraltel.net" type="cite">I
know in 2.6.3 the ability to pass partial messages to SpamAssassin
was put into place:
<br>
<br>
"- large messages beyond $sa_mail_body_size_limit are now
partially passed to SpamAssassin and other spam scanners for
checking: a copy passed to a spam scanner is truncated near or
slightly past the indicated limit. Large messages are no longer
given an almost free passage through spam checks"
<br>
<br>
Is it possible to revert back to the previous method of not
scanning these messages? Or is it considered better practice to go
ahead and provide some scanning giving the attachment and image
type spams we see periodically these days?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
so, you want the spammers to just attach a 500K pdf, or image and
you give them a free pass?<br>
Just curious, what advantage do you think this will give you?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Michael Scheidell, CTO<br>
o: 561-999-5000<br>
d: 561-948-2259<br>
<font color="#999999">></font><font color="#cc0000"> <b>| </b></font>SECNAP
Network Security Corporation
<style type="text/css">
<!--
.unnamed1 {
margin: 1em;
padding: 1px;
} -->
</style>
<ul class="unnamed1">
<li>Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011</li>
<li>Best Intrusion Prevention Product</li>
<li>Hot Company Finalist 2011</li>
<li>Best Email Security Product</li>
<li>Certified SNORT Integrator</li>
</ul>
</div>
<br>
<div id="disclaimer.secnap.com"><hr />
<p>This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®.
<br />For Information please see
<a href="http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/">http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/</a></p> <hr /></div>
<br>
</body>
</html>