RFC: handle UNCHECKED more precisely

[Carsten Wolff]

Hi,

On Friday 15 February 2013, Carsten Wolff wrote:
> currently, all mail that
> - contains a "mailbomb"
> - contains encrypted parts
> - contains any other undecipherable parts
> falls under content category "UNCHECKED" and thus shares a final
> destination. I think  it might be desirable to have different final
> destinations for these cases. Please take the attached (untested) patch to
> amavis 2.8 as a suggestion. It introduces two sub-cc's for UNCHECKED. One
> for mail that only contains encrypted parts (e.g. S/MIME), the other for
> mail that contains anything over limits (mailbombs?).

attached you'll find a tested version of the patch. I use it to defang 
"mailbombs" like they were in earlier amavis Versions, by the following 
configuration:

$defang_by_ccat{CC_UNCHECKED.",2"} = 1;

Please consider this patch, thank you.

Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: amavis-unchecked-subccs-v2.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6267 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/attachments/20130425/9fc527a2/attachment.bin>