$protocol = ESMTP: Bug, docu bug or a layer 8 problem?

[Pascal Volk]

On 01/16/2012 07:00 PM Mark Martinec wrote:
> Indeed, a documentation bug.  The 'ESMTP' is not a legal value there,
> just use 'SMTP'.  Fixing it now...   thanks!

Hi Mark,

now I'm a little bit confused, amavisd-new writes ESMTP also in received
headers:

Received: from filter.example.com (filter.example.com [127.128.129.130])
        by orange.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DB520523
                                            ^^^^^^^
        for <jdoe at example.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:19:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: at filter.example.com
Received: from orange.example.com ([127.0.0.1])
        by filter.example.com (filter.example.com [127.128.129.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
        with ESMTP id dtUozxthiLnz for <jdoe at example.com>;
            ^^^^^^^
        Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:19:33 +0100 (CET)


Regards,
Pascal
-- 
The trapper recommends today: cafebabe.1201821 at localdomain.org